SKIS AND FLOATS — Anything but Wheels
Here in Canada, when you meet a pilot who owns his or her own airplane, it won’t be long before you ask him or her, “You on floats, amphibs, skis or wheels?” There are not too many countries in this world where this is a relevant question—the Northern US and Alaska, and possibly Scandinavian countries. If you fly in Canada as a general aviation pilot, you do a lot of your flying over dihydrogen-monoxide—the liquid, solid and powdered forms of it.
In summer, flying over some areas of Northern Ontario or Québec, there aren’t too many places to put down in an emergency if your gear is made of rubber and is circular—but there is plenty of water. In the warmer months in the north of Canada you would be smart to have floats or amphibious gear bolted to the bottom of your airplane—for safety and for freedom—freedom to put down in any lake big enough to get out of. Free to throw a fishing line in a lake that hasn’t seen an angler in 20 years. Free to visit a friend’s cottage in the spring without getting mired in the muck. Floats make you free!
When you fly on wheels in the summer, you are well advised to keep a constant vigil for places to land in an emergency. Winter is another story. In winter, an airplane on skis is forever over a landing field. If your engine decides that it no longer wants to continue its work in -40C, if you smell smoke or if your propeller sheds a blade, all you have to do is let down and turn into the wind. Mind the fences. Short of a catastrophic structural failure, flying on skis is a safety feature that will save your life.
On skis, you can visit “Les Boys” at a river ice fishing village for some “hot dogs steamés” and “fèves au lard” (Rhum and Pepsi if you plan to stay the night), you can visit your Saskatchewan rancher buddy and pull up in the lower 40, or, if you have to just take a piss... right now... right here, skis give you a better option than a pickle jar.
You ask any Canuck pilot what he or she prefers—wheels, skis or floats and the answer will likely be:
Anything BUT Wheels
Despite researching material over the past eight years for the more than four hundred stories, albums, features and missives of Vintage News, I am still in awe of the historical, emotional and visual matrix that is the World Wide Web. While I am well aware that the web is not a universe of truth, fact, scholarly wisdom and purity of intent, it still astounds me every day for its ability to deliver to my hungry eyes images, stories and stored memories of humanity’s recent and sometimes cataclysmic history.
In particular, it is my wont to follow leads and key words to find information and images that support our stories of Canada’s aviation heritage and the heroes who populate this extraordinary and courageous legacy. I am, not weekly, not daily, but nearly every minute amazed by the images that I come across whilst researching a story’s background. More than likely these photos may have nothing immediately to do with the story I am background checking. For a couple of years, I just gawked like a Sunday driver passing an accident scene and then moved on, but a number of years ago, I opened a folder on my computer’s desktop which I called Random Beauty, and into which I dragged the images that caught my eye. Soon, there were hundreds of these digital images and Random Beauty became a recurring feature of Vintage News, sharing with our readers those riveting and sublime photographs found serendipitously and, with apologies, lifted.
Over the past years, I have divided this folder into a number of sub-categories with the intent of collecting images which were linked by theme or of a similar subject—until a critical mass was achieved and from this, a story or feature might possibly emerge. I have folders with titles such as Large Aircraft Formations, WTF?, Burning Aircraft, Bad Taste Nose Art, Heroic Portraits, Martin Marauder, or Vintage Aviation Advertising. A few years ago one of those folders, Low Flying, reached this critical mass and spawned a story entitled Lower Than a Snake’s Belly in a Wagon Rut that went viral around the world and netted our website more than 100,000 visits in two months. Before that, another called The Squadron Dog told the story of the curs, mutts and pedigreed pooches that have permeated air force operational history since Orville and Wilbur and the Saint Bernard they called Scipio. Now, another of these collections, a folder called Anything BUT Wheels, has matured, grown fat and gestated enough for me to wring from it a story... or rather a cultural and visual compendium.
To qualify to be saved to the Anything BUT Wheels folder, a photo had to be of a military/combat aircraft on floats or skis that was NOT designed from the get go as a float plane, flying boat, or bush plane. I started with fighter aircraft, but soon branched to military aircraft of all sorts—except purpose-built float aircraft. The folder first contained images of Spitfires on floats and P-51 Mustangs on skis, but soon there were trainers and the odd transport aircraft (though these had to be military transports). I wanted to explore the one-offs, the failures and the successes, not for any other reason than that it was, well... cool.
Related Stories
Click on image
Reading through material connected with each photo, I found it was rare for a combat aircraft (fighter, dive bomber, torpedo bomber) to be outfitted with pontoon floats and be a success... except in the case of certain Japanese fighters such as the Mitsubishi A6M Zero turned into the Rufe float plane. Most of the Second World War fighters were a perfect collection of optimized ideas, years of aerodynamic study and a whole lot of just plain style. There was no consideration in their creation of how they might work on floats and, in most cases, bolting on to their undersides two massive sealed aluminum fuselages led to the scrap heap. When it came to floats, the Japanese were the hands-down winners. When it came to skis, it was the Scandinavians and the Russians.
Perhaps in the case of ski planes and float planes, it was necessity that made them a success. The Japanese could not possibly protect their massive and far-flung empire without float planes—thousands of islands, some not big enough for an airstrip or too far away to construct one economically. They opted for float plane fighters, and though they may not have had the widespread early successes of their land and carrier based relatives, they held their own.
In the land of the midnight sun in the 1930s, the Finns had a lot of mistrust for the Soviets and long before the first of their two wars against the Soviets between 1939 and 1944, they readied themselves by developing ski-plane technology. Having aircraft on skis debilitated the performance of their aircraft somewhat, but the ability to disperse aircraft on frozen lakes and snow covered meadows enabled the Finnish Air Force, the Ilmavoimat, to hold their own against the Soviet juggernaut. The Finns hated the Soviets so much that they supported the Germans during their invasion of the Soviet Union. Though they had not signed the Tripartite Pact (Germany–Italy–Japan), they were deemed an enemy by the Allies who largely left it up to the Soviets to deal with them. The Finns fought the Soviets in the Winter War (the winter of 1939–40) and the Continuation War from 1941 to 1944 and the Communists failed to best them. Though Sweden claimed to be neutral, it did in fact send a secret air force unit called F-19—aircraft, aircrew and ground support—to fight alongside the Finns during the Winter War. All three air forces (the Finnish Ilmavoimat, the Swedish Flygvapnet and the Soviet air force) made use of ski-plane technology not just experimentally, but at squadron strength.
Fighters on Floats
This collection of photographs culled from the World Wide Web is by no means complete. I am sure there are other combat aircraft, military trainers and transport aircraft that qualify for inclusion, and I encourage you to send them in. The only stipulation is that they should not be designed originally as a float plane or flying boat. So, let’s get the show on the road... or rather, on the water.
Combat Ski-Planes
In Canada, we have a saying… There are two seasons—winter and 6 months of poor snowmobiling. One would think that, with her massive land form blanketed in snow for a good portion of the year, Canada would be a country that fully embraced ski-plane technology for its combat aircraft—like Finland. Truth be told, the Royal Canadian Air Force was, during the Second World War, and indeed even today, an operator of ski-equipped aircraft. During the war however, this was largely to permit training to continue apace in regions of heavy snow and for liaison aircraft flying in and out of these bases. There were many military aircraft to be found on skis in Canada, but they were elementary training aircraft, bush planes like the Noorduyn Norseman during the war, the de Havilland Canada Beaver and Otter in the immediate postwar period and the Twin Otter today.
There was no pressing need in Canada to provide ski-equipped combat aircraft... the war—the one on snow—was conducted very far away. The Finns, Swedes and Soviets, however, were conducting combat operations in geography and weather conditions that necessitated squadron strength ski-equipped fighters and dive bombers. Unlike float experiments with fighters and bombers, ski-adapted combat aircraft were, for the most part, relatively successful—particularly in combat zones where the enemy was also on skis.
There were, however, experiments with ski-equipment for RCAF fighters like the Hurricane and Canada was a testing ground for some American experiments with equipping fighters with skis. This photo compendium addresses simply those aircraft you would not expect to be on skis.
Flygvapnet – The Swedish Air Force
Like the Finns, the Swedes are a resourceful and determined people—not to be trifled with. Though they were neutral during the Second World War, they still had an air force and they were under no misconception about their national safety. Long before the war, the Swedes had developed experience with combat aircraft on skis... out of necessity. Skis enabled them to operate anywhere during winter and to disperse their aircraft to keep them from being destroyed in airfield strikes. When the Finns found themselves in the Winter War with the much larger Soviet Union, Sweden sent a ski-equipped combat unit called F-19 to support the Finns in operations in the far north. With Swedish national markings painted over with the blue swastika (which had nothing to do with the Nazi symbol), the Swedes fought side by side with their fellow Scandinavians against the Slavic Soviets. The Soviets had triple the manpower, 100 times more tanks, and 30 times more aircraft... but they were unable to really get the upper hand in a substantial way. In the end, the Finns were forced to make concessions, but the Soviet Red Army was humiliated by their inability to crush a much smaller opponent. In addition, the League of Nations was seen to be absolutely powerless to do anything about the Soviet invasion of Finland, which they considered illegal. The Soviet Union was tossed from the League, but this did nothing to stop the Soviet advance on Finland.
Perhaps one of the most important outcomes of the Winter War was the pathetic performance of the Red Army. In the Red Army’s humiliation, Adolph Hitler found encouragement to move forward with a plan to attack the Soviet Union. Just a few days after the commencement of Operation BARBAROSSA, the German invasion of the USSR, the Soviets and Finns went at it again in what became known as the Continuation War.
Ilmavoimat – The Finnish Air Force
It makes sense that the land of the greatest ever ski jumpers, biathletes and cross-country skiers would also have the widest experience in operating ski-equipped military aircraft. Tiny Finland, faced with fighting a voracious Soviet Red Army, became a co-belligerent state with the Axis powers. While they did not sign the Tripartite Pact with Germany, Italy and Japan, they were aligned with Germany against the Soviet Union later in the war. At the beginning, in the Winter War of 1939–40, they were left to fend for themselves against the Soviets. The Winter War resulted in concessions to the USSR (the Karelian Isthmus and other areas). When the Germans invaded the USSR in Operation BARBAROSSA, Finland allowed German aircraft to refuel at Finnish bases. In retaliation the Soviet Union bombed bases across Finland and the Finns in turn declared war on the USSR. The Finnish Air Force would operate a complex array of borrowed, bought and recovered aircraft from American, British, Czechoslovakian, Dutch, French, German, Italian, Soviet, and Swedish manufacturers. Many of these types were modified to operate on skis.
Soviet Air Defence Forces
Our image of Russia in the Second World War is one of hoards of cheering Red Army soldiers charging across a frozen plain in white winter gear, followed by T-34 tanks splashed in white paint and covered in more soldiers. It’s an image of a great nation fighting for its very life with their one great weapon—sheer numbers. The Russians understood winter in a way the Germans never would. They embraced the harsh environment with simple technologies and uncomplicated weapons systems—tanks and aircraft that were easy to fix and operate especially on snow and ice at unprepared and constantly moving air fields. Ski technology was an important part of their winter wars.